<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The &#8220;R&#8221; Factor stands for &#8220;Retarded&#8221;</title>
	<link>http://redrooster.485i.com/2008/07/20/the-r-factor-stands-for-retarded/</link>
	<description>Crowing madly.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 00:52:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: mary</title>
		<link>http://redrooster.485i.com/2008/07/20/the-r-factor-stands-for-retarded/#comment-896</link>
		<author>mary</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 00:51:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://redrooster.485i.com/2008/07/20/the-r-factor-stands-for-retarded/#comment-896</guid>
		<description>why does everything think it's okay to use the word retarded as slang?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why does everything think it&#8217;s okay to use the word retarded as slang?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rex</title>
		<link>http://redrooster.485i.com/2008/07/20/the-r-factor-stands-for-retarded/#comment-895</link>
		<author>Rex</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 15:49:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://redrooster.485i.com/2008/07/20/the-r-factor-stands-for-retarded/#comment-895</guid>
		<description>Nick: fuck, that's what I'm known for too!

The rest of you: you're all wrong. This list is completely valid for one reason: Lock is below me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nick: fuck, that&#8217;s what I&#8217;m known for too!</p>
<p>The rest of you: you&#8217;re all wrong. This list is completely valid for one reason: Lock is below me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Blagg</title>
		<link>http://redrooster.485i.com/2008/07/20/the-r-factor-stands-for-retarded/#comment-894</link>
		<author>Alex Blagg</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 14:26:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://redrooster.485i.com/2008/07/20/the-r-factor-stands-for-retarded/#comment-894</guid>
		<description>KNEEL BEFORE ZOD!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>KNEEL BEFORE ZOD!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Douglas</title>
		<link>http://redrooster.485i.com/2008/07/20/the-r-factor-stands-for-retarded/#comment-893</link>
		<author>Nick Douglas</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 08:31:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://redrooster.485i.com/2008/07/20/the-r-factor-stands-for-retarded/#comment-893</guid>
		<description>List's jacked. To prove it, I posit that if they compile a list for SF with the same methodology, I'll be on it. Or more likely, Ariel Waldman will be in the top ten. I can't even get a Twitter meme going and my web show has virtually nil viewers. Ariel is mostly known for photographing herself, demanding customer service, and staring into her phone at parties.

I could go on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>List&#8217;s jacked. To prove it, I posit that if they compile a list for SF with the same methodology, I&#8217;ll be on it. Or more likely, Ariel Waldman will be in the top ten. I can&#8217;t even get a Twitter meme going and my web show has virtually nil viewers. Ariel is mostly known for photographing herself, demanding customer service, and staring into her phone at parties.</p>
<p>I could go on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle Bunch</title>
		<link>http://redrooster.485i.com/2008/07/20/the-r-factor-stands-for-retarded/#comment-892</link>
		<author>Kyle Bunch</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 01:29:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://redrooster.485i.com/2008/07/20/the-r-factor-stands-for-retarded/#comment-892</guid>
		<description>23rd most public in New York?  

This is because of my episode with the trenchcoat and the indecent exposure in the East Village, isn't it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>23rd most public in New York?  </p>
<p>This is because of my episode with the trenchcoat and the indecent exposure in the East Village, isn&#8217;t it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Van</title>
		<link>http://redrooster.485i.com/2008/07/20/the-r-factor-stands-for-retarded/#comment-890</link>
		<author>Brian Van</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 23:14:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://redrooster.485i.com/2008/07/20/the-r-factor-stands-for-retarded/#comment-890</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Jeff Jarvis commented on the Rooster? That's like Michael Jordan sitting courtside for your pickup b-ball game. I suddenly feel like I should come up with a better game than this, or retire immediately.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hi everyone! I agree with all of you. As one of the listees mentioned today over email, "LINK BAIT!" (And, it turns out, not just for NowPublic, but for me too. I honestly was just trying to get Rex and Krucoff to comment somehow.) &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I think this ties into the Jessica Roy argument from the other day, which I have linked over on the Tumblr (http://brianvan.tumblr.com). Choire made an argument that many of the "Brooklyn scene" writers, borne of blogs, were NOT in control of "the scene" because they could barely get out of bed in the morning and not have a nervous breakdown. (A fact not true of most people on the list, except, hey, look, there's Emily Gould! And she was one of the most forbidding people at the party where this all started. Anyways...) &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I know half the people on this list (as either an observer or a face-to-face contact), and they are all extremely effective communicators due to their hyper-communicative qualities and extensive self-branding efforts. (Scott Kidder? Maybe not. When I think of him, I think, "He's dating Kate." Maybe she should be on the list instead.) They may not be ranked in any sort of sensible order, and there are endless omissions, but this is indeed a list of people-to-watch. They don't have total control over the NYC Internet "scene", but you'd be wrong to think they have NO power, either. If you don't own your own well-funded startup, try dating any of the people on this list, having a very messy breakup with one of them, and then see how many parties you get invited to after that!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But I would hope that, if someone's going to publish a list like this, it has at least the tiniest root in reality. **sigh**&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff Jarvis commented on the Rooster? That&#8217;s like Michael Jordan sitting courtside for your pickup b-ball game. I suddenly feel like I should come up with a better game than this, or retire immediately.</p>
<p>Hi everyone! I agree with all of you. As one of the listees mentioned today over email, &#8220;LINK BAIT!&#8221; (And, it turns out, not just for NowPublic, but for me too. I honestly was just trying to get Rex and Krucoff to comment somehow.) </p>
<p>I think this ties into the Jessica Roy argument from the other day, which I have linked over on the Tumblr (http://brianvan.tumblr.com). Choire made an argument that many of the &#8220;Brooklyn scene&#8221; writers, borne of blogs, were NOT in control of &#8220;the scene&#8221; because they could barely get out of bed in the morning and not have a nervous breakdown. (A fact not true of most people on the list, except, hey, look, there&#8217;s Emily Gould! And she was one of the most forbidding people at the party where this all started. Anyways&#8230;) </p>
<p>I know half the people on this list (as either an observer or a face-to-face contact), and they are all extremely effective communicators due to their hyper-communicative qualities and extensive self-branding efforts. (Scott Kidder? Maybe not. When I think of him, I think, &#8220;He&#8217;s dating Kate.&#8221; Maybe she should be on the list instead.) They may not be ranked in any sort of sensible order, and there are endless omissions, but this is indeed a list of people-to-watch. They don&#8217;t have total control over the NYC Internet &#8220;scene&#8221;, but you&#8217;d be wrong to think they have NO power, either. If you don&#8217;t own your own well-funded startup, try dating any of the people on this list, having a very messy breakup with one of them, and then see how many parties you get invited to after that!</p>
<p>But I would hope that, if someone&#8217;s going to publish a list like this, it has at least the tiniest root in reality. **sigh**</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Jarvis</title>
		<link>http://redrooster.485i.com/2008/07/20/the-r-factor-stands-for-retarded/#comment-888</link>
		<author>Jeff Jarvis</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 19:58:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://redrooster.485i.com/2008/07/20/the-r-factor-stands-for-retarded/#comment-888</guid>
		<description>I'm on it and I thought it was odd -- and not just for that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m on it and I thought it was odd &#8212; and not just for that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allison Mooney</title>
		<link>http://redrooster.485i.com/2008/07/20/the-r-factor-stands-for-retarded/#comment-887</link>
		<author>Allison Mooney</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 19:43:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://redrooster.485i.com/2008/07/20/the-r-factor-stands-for-retarded/#comment-887</guid>
		<description>i'm totally with bill and noah. lists are subjective, arbitrary, flattering, and should always be taken with a grain of salt. i can think of a thousand people who should be there instead of me, Mike especially. And there are tons of lists I'm sure he will top (mine included).  

but it's an interesting question whether public = influential. As with everything in life, I think there's a balance. If you spout nonsense into a microphone, people will tune you out. But if you whisper your wisdom, they won't hear you either. It's probably about the right people hear you say the right things at the right time. 

And who are you influencing anyway? Market-movers or the twittering masses? One would inherently get more exposure than the other. 

But here's a thought that's consoling (if not a bit saccharine): the people with the most real influence will ultimately come out on top where it matters--in life, not a list.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;m totally with bill and noah. lists are subjective, arbitrary, flattering, and should always be taken with a grain of salt. i can think of a thousand people who should be there instead of me, Mike especially. And there are tons of lists I&#8217;m sure he will top (mine included).  </p>
<p>but it&#8217;s an interesting question whether public = influential. As with everything in life, I think there&#8217;s a balance. If you spout nonsense into a microphone, people will tune you out. But if you whisper your wisdom, they won&#8217;t hear you either. It&#8217;s probably about the right people hear you say the right things at the right time. </p>
<p>And who are you influencing anyway? Market-movers or the twittering masses? One would inherently get more exposure than the other. </p>
<p>But here&#8217;s a thought that&#8217;s consoling (if not a bit saccharine): the people with the most real influence will ultimately come out on top where it matters&#8211;in life, not a list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Noah Brier</title>
		<link>http://redrooster.485i.com/2008/07/20/the-r-factor-stands-for-retarded/#comment-886</link>
		<author>Noah Brier</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 18:12:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://redrooster.485i.com/2008/07/20/the-r-factor-stands-for-retarded/#comment-886</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I'm with you. How they come up with this stuff is beyond me. (Though I'm still constantly surprised by the lack of transparency.)

With that said, lists are good business. Everybody always writes about them (I was about to write something similar myself).

That said, I did get a kick out of it, I'm not going to lie. It's cool to see your name near the top of a list, even though there's no possible criteria that would make me deserving of such a spot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I&#8217;m with you. How they come up with this stuff is beyond me. (Though I&#8217;m still constantly surprised by the lack of transparency.)</p>
<p>With that said, lists are good business. Everybody always writes about them (I was about to write something similar myself).</p>
<p>That said, I did get a kick out of it, I&#8217;m not going to lie. It&#8217;s cool to see your name near the top of a list, even though there&#8217;s no possible criteria that would make me deserving of such a spot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bill c.</title>
		<link>http://redrooster.485i.com/2008/07/20/the-r-factor-stands-for-retarded/#comment-885</link>
		<author>bill c.</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 16:41:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://redrooster.485i.com/2008/07/20/the-r-factor-stands-for-retarded/#comment-885</guid>
		<description>Yeah man.  That's a dumb list with a dumb way of "figuring out" who's influential.  It might be a decent way of figuring out who's "public", hahaha but what difference does that make if you're REALLY PUBLIC and not saying jack that anyone cares about?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah man.  That&#8217;s a dumb list with a dumb way of &#8220;figuring out&#8221; who&#8217;s influential.  It might be a decent way of figuring out who&#8217;s &#8220;public&#8221;, hahaha but what difference does that make if you&#8217;re REALLY PUBLIC and not saying jack that anyone cares about?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
